Tuesday, November 29, 2011

First 50 mile week

I am heading for my first 50 mile week since the 2006 Twin Cities Marathon. Today I ran 9 miles in the cool but sunny 37-degree temps in shorts. Last week I broke out the long running pants for the first time since last winter. That was difficult. I hate running in pants. Today was nice in shorts, and thankfully there was little wind. The sun felt good, too.

The run led me through Crosby Farms and then through Hidden Falls Regional Park. I had never before contemplated the name of the park--but today I found the namesake waterfall, whose little cascades and pools impressed me in the now naked forest dimly lit by the low winter sunlight. Sometimes I am pleasantly surprised by the small natural gems we have that are so close to the neighborhoods and high rises of the city. I also ran in a new pair of running shoes, and I am pleased to have introduced them to such sites and sights on today's 9 mile trip.

Tomorrow because of work scheduling, I'm planning a two-a-day. 4 miles in the morning and 4 miles in the evening. Blaise recently spoke of some studies that report that running twice in a day is better for your training and recovery than running one big run each day. Less strain and and fewer micro-tears of muscles=better recovery. I certainly believe in keeping a weekly long run intact, but perhaps on recovery days, if you want to keep the miles high, breaking the 10 miler, for example, into two 5 milers is a good idea? What do you gurus think?

1 comment:

  1. When I was training for Twin Cities back in 2006, I was a big fan of the twofers. I did notice the difference in recovery. Especially if I did a somewhat longer run in the morning (8-12) followed by a short run in the evening (4-5). Much less stress. But (unless you're a pilot) it is hard to work two runs into your daily routine. You have to be twice as motivated.

    ReplyDelete